A Good Decision? The New Arrangement for Health Care in Ontario

Authors

  • Paul Barker Brescia University College, Western University
  • John Church UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/20211798

Keywords:

Ontario, Alberta, Health Policy

Abstract

Abstract

Recently, a new government of Ontario decided to replace the province’s health care system with a different approach to the management of health services. The major portion of the change meant that several regional health agencies would be combined into a single health authority. The decision mirrored one that had been made ten years earlier in Alberta, which allows for an opportunity to assess the decision of Ontario. This paper compares the performance of the single authority in Alberta and the regional authorities in Ontario for the past ten years. A superior performance by Alberta would suggest that the single authority is preferable to the regional arrangement and that Ontario had made a sound decision. A contrary result would give reason for believing differently. The comparison indicates that the Ontario government might have been too hasty in opting for a single health authority.

Résumé

Récemment, un nouveau gouvernement de l’Ontario a décidé de remplacer le système de soins de santé de la province par une approche différente de la gestion des services de santé. La majeure partie du changement signifiait que plusieurs organismes régionaux de santé seraient regroupés en une seule autorité sanitaire. La décision reflétait celle qui avait été prise dix ans plus tôt en Alberta, ce qui permet d’évaluer la décision de l’Ontario. Le présent document compare le rendement de l’administration unique en Alberta et des administrations régionales de l’Ontario au cours des dix dernières années. Un rendement supérieur de l’Alberta donne à penser que l’autorité unique est préférable à l’entente régionale et que l’Ontario a pris une décision judicieuse. Un résultat contraire donnerait des raisons de croire différemment. La comparaison indique que le gouvernement de l’Ontario a peut-être été trop hâtif en optant pour une seule autorité sanitaire.

Key Words: Ontario, Alberta, health authorities, comparison, regional approach

Mot-clés: Ontario, Alberta, régies de la santé, comparaison, approche régionale

Author Biographies

Paul Barker, Brescia University College, Western University

Paul Barker is Associate Professor, Political Science, at Brescia University College, London, Ontario. Professor Barker received his Ph.D. from the University of Toronto. He has written articles on public policy that have appeared in Canadian Public Administration, Canadian Public Policy, and the Canadian Journal of Law and Society.

John Church, UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA

John Church, Ph.D., is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Alberta. He has researched and taught health policy for three decades.  During this time he has worked with governments, NGOs and professional associations at the international, national, provincial and local level to strategize, develop and evaluate health policy reforms.  His most recent co-edited book, Paradigm Freeze: Why It Is So Hard to Reform Health Care in Canada, examines efforts to reform health care in five Canadian provinces. His forthcoming book, Alberta: A Health System Profile, is due to be released in early 2021.


Downloads

Published

2022-04-14

How to Cite

Barker, P., & Church, J. (2022). A Good Decision? The New Arrangement for Health Care in Ontario. Canadian Political Science Review, 15(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/20211798

Issue

Section

Articles