Quebec’s Family Medicine Groups: Innovation and Compromise in the Reform of Front-Line Care

Authors

  • Marie-Pascale Pomey University of Montreal
  • Elisabeth Martin Universite Laval
  • Pierre-Gerlier Forest Trudeau Foundation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/2009193

Keywords:

Health reform, Canada, Quebec

Abstract

At their origin, public healthcare systems were designed mainly for the treatment of acute illnesses. For many years, therefore, public health care focused on services offered in healthcare establishments and primary care was allowed to evolve on the periphery of hospitals, with doctors free to follow their own conception of how best to provide and follow up on care. As hospital costs grew, however, and new challenges regarding the provision of care began to emerge, governments felt increasingly responsible for organizing the front line (Nolte and McKee 2008). How doctors would be called upon to participate in the new configuration of services—particularly in Canada, where physicians function as independent entrepreneurs—is the subject of this article, which investigates the decision to introduce family medicine groups (FMGs) to the province of Quebec.

Author Biographies

Marie-Pascale Pomey, University of Montreal

Marie-Pascale Pomey, Department of Health Administration, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, CP 6128, Succ. Centre Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7; marie-pascale.pomey@umontreal.ca;

Elisabeth Martin, Universite Laval

Elisabeth Martin, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pavillon De l'Est, Université Laval, 2180, Chemin Ste-Foy, local 2104, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6 elizabeth.martin@capp.ulaval.ca;

Pierre-Gerlier Forest, Trudeau Foundation

Pierre-Gerlier Forest, Ph.D., Trudeau Foundation, 1514, avenue Docteur-Penfield, 2e étage, Montréal, Québec H3G 1B9 pgforest@fondationtrudeau.ca

Downloads

How to Cite

Pomey, M.-P., Martin, E., & Forest, P.-G. (2009). Quebec’s Family Medicine Groups: Innovation and Compromise in the Reform of Front-Line Care. Canadian Political Science Review, 3(4), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/2009193