It is about time! Exploring the clashing timeframes of politics and public policy experiments

Abstract

Although existing studies on experimental policymaking have acknowledged the importance of the political setting in which policy experiments

take place, we lack systematic knowledge on how various political dimensions affect experimental policymaking. In this article, we address

a specific gap in the existing understanding of the politics of experimentation: how political timeframes influence experimental policymaking.

Drawing on theoretical discussions on experimental policymaking, public policy, electoral politics, and mediatization of politics, we outline ex-

pectations about how electoral and problem cycles may influence the timing, design, and learning from policy experiments. We argue electoral

timeframes are likely to discourage politicians from undertaking large-scale policy experiments and if politicians decide to launch experiments,

they prefer shorter designs. The electoral cycle may lead politicians to draw too hasty conclusions or ignore the experiment’s results altogether.

We expect problem cycles to shorten politicians’ time horizons further as there is pressure to solve problems quickly. We probe the plausibility

of our theoretical expectations using interview data from two different country contexts: Estonia and Finland.